Understaffing in Nursing: Literature Review

Table of Contents

Inadequate nurse staffing is a problem that has plagued the healthcare industry for a long time. Understaffing is associated with adverse health outcomes such as reduction in the quality of health services, high incidence of medical errors, and poor patient satisfaction (Profit et al., 2014). As a result, it is necessary to look into methods of enhancing nursing staff levels in healthcare settings. The purpose of this literature review is to compare existing information concerning the issue of understaffing in nursing. This paper compares the research questions, sample populations, and limitations of studies addressing the problem of inadequate nursing staff. Recommendations from the literature to address the research problem are also provided.

A Comparison of Research Questions

Kim and Mehrorta (2015) aimed at investigating the prevailing staffing levels and schedules to provide detailed solutions to the shortfalls of the second stage of scheduling. McHugh and Ma (2014) determined the impact of wages and work environments on nurse burnout in a hospital setting. Conversely, Twigg, Myers, Duffield, Pugh, Gelder, and Roche (2016) questioned how adding nursing assistants to teams in acute care wards would affect patient outcomes.

Similarly, McHugh et al. (2016) examined how enhanced nurse staffing and good working conditions influenced the survival rates of patients with cardiac arrest while Cho, Kim, Yeon, You, and Lee (2015) tested the impact of nursing shortage on missed nursing outcomes by contrasting the incidence of missed nursing care in hospitals with high staffing rates versus hospitals with low staffing levels. A study conducted by Profit et al. (2014) also sought to evaluate and illustrate the relationship between burnout rates in nurses working in neonatal intensive care units and patient safety culture.

On the contrary, Fagerstrom, Lonning, and Andersen (2014) probed the effectiveness of the RAFAELA staffing system in maintaining high staffing rates. Even with good salaries and adequate staffing levels, nurses need to feel appreciated and supported, especially when they join the practice field for the first time. Hence, Edwards, Hawker, Carrier, and Rees (2015) examined the strategies of implementing the transition of student nurses into qualified nurses and the effectiveness of these tactics on retaining newly-employed nurses.

A Comparison of Sample Populations

The studies reviewed varied in terms of settings and participants. Kim and Mehrorta (2015) developed a simulation model based on a virtual clinical model and applied it to a clinical setting. However, no specific sample populations were provided. McHugh and Ma (2014), Twigg et al. (2016), and Profit et al. (2014) carried out their research in clinical settings involving 100,000, 256,302, and 2,073 respondents respectively.

Edwards et al. (2015) and Cho et al. (2015) also conducted their investigations in clinical settings. However, Edwards et al. (2015) examined 11,160 files belonging to adult patients, whereas 232 nurses participated in the study by Cho et al. (2015). Fagerstrom et al. (2014) and McHugh et al. (2016) conducted systematic reviews of the literature by appraising 30 and 40 research articles respectively.

A Comparison of the Limitations of the Study

Kim and Mehrorta (2015) admitted that the integrated staffing and scheduling model used was relevant only for a single unit, which limited the generalizability of the model to complex systems. The model also presumed that nurses had similar skill sets, which was not true in practice settings. McHugh and Ma (2014) and McHugh et al. (2016) acknowledged that the cross-sectional designs constrained the capacity to infer causality.

Additionally, McHugh and Ma (2014) reported that the survey and wage data preceded the economic recession that started at the close of 2007. Consequently, there was a likelihood that the financial depression could have interfered with perceptions of the undesirable features of the work settings. Another shortcoming was that the outcomes of the study were nurse-specific, whereas the wage data were not, which could have affected the magnitude of the observed gains (McHugh & Ma, 2014).

Twigg et al. (2016) admitted that the pre-test and post-test method of analysis could have obscured the accuracy of the ward type data because patients received care in different wards in a single admission. Additionally, the dates when adverse events occurred were not recorded. Another limitation of the study was large variations in the deployment of nursing assistants in the hospital (Twigg et al., 2016).

Profit et al. (2014) only used data from volunteer regional, community, and intermediate NICUs, which affected the accuracy and generalizability of the outcomes. Edwards et al. (2015) limited their search to English hence excluding other relevant studies in different languages. Fagerstrom et al. (2014) reported that one limitation of the RAFAELA system was the inability to maximize the nurse proficiency variable. The self-assessment of missed nursing outcomes could have affected the accuracy of the findings by Cho et al. (2015).

Conclusion

Despite the shortcomings of the studies, the literature review showed that poor wages, understaffing, burnout, and unfriendly work environments lowered nurse satisfaction and increased turnover rates, which were associated with poor patient outcomes. On the other hand, improving the working environment by creating better wages and employing extra help led to high satisfaction levels in nurses and quality patient outcomes. Additionally, providing support during the transition of nurses from student status into newly-qualified nurses enhanced job satisfaction thus reducing nurse turnover rates and improving patient outcomes.

The use of computational models also facilitated the prediction of staffing and scheduling problems, which could help managers to foresee staffing issues and address them promptly. Therefore, healthcare settings should strive to improve their work environments using the recommended strategies to minimize nurse burnout, improve job satisfaction, reduce turnover rates, and enhance patient outcomes. Future studies should look into additional strategies for simulating staffing and work scheduling problems in complex healthcare systems.

References

Cho, S. H., Kim, Y. S., Yeon, K. N., You, S. J., & Lee, I. D. (2015). Effects of increasing nurse staffing on missed nursing care. International Nursing Review, 62(2), 267-274.

Edwards, D., Hawker, C., Carrier, J., & Rees. C. (2015). A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies and interventions to improve the transition from student to newly qualified nurse. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(7), 1254-1268.

Fagerstrom, L., Lonning, K., & Andersen, M. H. (2014). The RAFAELA system: A workforce planning tool for nurse staffing and human resource management. Nursing Management, 21(2), 30-36.

Kim, K., & Mehrotra, S. (2015). A two-stage stochastic integer programming approach to integrated staffing and scheduling with application to nurse management. Operations Research, 63(6), 1431-1451.

McHugh, M. D., & Ma, C. (2014). Wage, work environment, and staffing: effects on nurse outcomes. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 15(3-4), 72-80.

McHugh, M. D., Rochman, M. F., Sloane, D. M., Berg, R. A., Mancini, M. E., Nadkarni, V. M., … Aiken, L. H. (2016). Better nurse staffing and nurse work environments associated with increased survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Medical Care, 54(1), 74-80.

Profit, J., Sharek, P. J., Amspoker, A. B., Kowalkowski, M. A., Nisbet, C. C., Thomas, E. J., … Sexton, J. B. (2014). Burnout in the NICU setting and its relation to safety culture. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(10), 806-813.

Twigg, D. E., Myers, H., Duffield, C., Pugh, J. D., Gelder, L., & Roche, M. (2016). The impact of adding assistants in nursing to acute care hospital ward nurse staffing on adverse patient outcomes: An analysis of administrative health data. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 63(1), 189-200.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Online Academic Experts
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Emergency Management
Overall, I think it's a great service. I have yet to submit the assignment, so I don't know what kind of grade I'll get. But customer service was excellent. Reviews were made and the assignment proofed for satisfaction.
Customer 453015, December 15th, 2021
Business and administrative studies
awesome work
Customer 453201, June 15th, 2022
Nursing
It was a very long paper, but she followed all the instructions, and she even finished the paper 5 days before the due date. Will write an essay with her again, thanks!
Customer 452967, November 27th, 2021
Management
It's the second time I use this service and it does not let me down. Work quality is so good for its price!
Customer 452985, December 3rd, 2021
Psychology
quick, fast and exact!
Customer 453027, May 24th, 2022
Psychology
Thank you!
Customer 452545, February 6th, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
My son and I have been sick for two weeks, of course at the end of my semester. I am so grateful that myhomeworkgeeks were able to help! Both papers got A's and I couldn't be more thrilled! Thank you so much and don't forget to tip your writer!
Customer 453077, February 22nd, 2022
Economics
Nice work
Customer 453185, May 21st, 2022
Nursing
Thank you so much for your help! :)
Customer 453167, May 11th, 2022
Health Care
The writer did not follow my choice of topic (Food/Water Insecurity, Hunger, & Poverty), the paper was instead written about Climate Change in Africa. However, the paper was still great and informative. Thank you!
Customer 452777, January 28th, 2022
Management
It was gotten well after time I needed to make needed additions, but it is something that did help me. I could not get the concept of ho to start such a project but now reading this, I was over thinking the project it seems.
Customer 452801, July 19th, 2021
Nursing
I just need some minor alterations. Thanks.
Customer 452547, February 10th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
AllEscortAllEscort
Live ChatWhatsApp
AllEscort