Reduction of Infection as a Result of Nursing Education in Taking Care of Ports and Catheters

Introduction

In the United States, millions of catheters are purchased annually. Intravascular catheters make an indispensable part of modern-day nursing practice, particularly in oncology units. The use of catheters has its inarguable benefits: it provides necessary vascular access for the administration of treatment. However, exposure to intravascular catheterization makes patients vulnerable to local and systemic infectious complications. The said complications include but are not limited to local site infection, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), endocarditis, and septic thrombophlebitis. The incidence of each of the conditions is contingent on a variety of factors. For instance, for CRBSI, the contributing factors include the type of catheter, frequency of use, and patient-related factors. Local or bloodstream infections (BSIs) are often associated with peripheral venous catheters that are most commonly used for intravascular access. It is argued that yet another important factor shaping patient outcomes is nursing education on the subject matter.

Problem Statement

Statistically, in the United States, patients are exposed to the central venous catheter (CVC) 15 million days annually. The average rate of CVC-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) is roughly five per 1,000 catheter days (Rupp & Karnatak, 2018). Therefore, one can approximate that there are about 80,000 CVC-related BSIs happening in the US each year. At present, there is no consensus on the mortality rate associated with BSIs: research reports figures ranging from zero to 35% in mortality (Rupp & Karnatak, 2018). Regardless, CVC-associated infections create a nationwide financial burden with an attributable cost per infection of $34,508–$56,000 and the total cost ranging from $296 million to$2.3 billion (Rupp & Karnatak, 2018). Oncology units have their peculiarities when it comes to hospital-acquired infections: See et al. (2016) report that antimicrobial-resistant E. coli and E. faecium are now serious pathogens in oncology. Reducing the infection rate will mean a lesser financial burden, better patient outcomes, and an increase in the quality of life for patients.

PICOT Question Explanation of Each Component

Population of Interest

The population of interest for this study project consists of oncology nurses. Today, oncology nurses are experiencing an unusually high workload due to the soaring cancer rates in North America. Cummings et al. (2018) predict that 45% of North American women and 49% of North American men will experience cancer during their lifetime with one-fourth of all cases being lethal. Cummings et al. (2018) reason that the role of oncology nurses will continue to evolve and likely include specialization and advanced training. On top of that, oncology nurses are expected to take on leadership roles and develop the field. For the reasons stated above, it is only reasonable to provide oncology nurses with better education on catheter use in oncology units.

Intervention of Interest

The intervention of interest is a short-term educational course in a hospital setting for nurses employed in oncology units. The course should cover all important topics and problems related to catheter and port use and be evidence-based. Some of the topics to be addressed may include but are not limited to the choice of catheter, insertion technique, disinfection, catheter dressing and maintenance, and guidance. Special attention should be paid to infections in oncology units since, as mentioned before, some aspects such as pathogens may vary. Gao et al. (2015) also warn about the delayed onset of infectious complications for oncology patients with an average time of 98.26 days after the use of a catheter. There is evidence suggesting the effectiveness of education in reducing the rates of BSIs in hospitals. For instance, Bell and O’Grady (2018) report that the use of multiple strategies and adherence to evidence-based guidelines results in a drop in the infection rate (both CRBSI and CLABSI).

Comparison of Interest

The current study project will focus on the same sample of nurses and will compare their pre-training knowledge to their post-training knowledge in the form of a multiple-choice test or open-ended questions. It would not be exactly reasonable to divide the sample into the intervention and control groups because it would not prioritize current healthcare needs. As many nurses as possible should be educated on the subject matter simultaneously.

Outcome of Interest

As mentioned before, the current research seeks to bring down the CVC-associated infections rates in oncology units through continuing education of nurses. The goal is to lower the incidence rate for a given hospital and keep it lower than statewide or nationwide metrics. Eventually, research might also address the financial aspect of the problem and look into the cost efficiency of training.

Timeframe

The proposed timeframe for the current study is from eight to 16 weeks.

Conclusion

Hospital-acquired infections associated with catheter and port use are common complications in American hospitals. Every year, they take the lives of patients, decrease the quality of life for others, and contribute to the financial burden of the healthcare system. Oncology units deserve special attention in this discussion as they have their unique characteristics when it comes to CVC-associated complications. The current research project seeks to determine the effectiveness of nurse training on the evidence-based use of catheters and ports in oncology patients. The desired outcome is a reduction in the infection rate at eight to 16 weeks post-training.

References

Bell, T., & O’Grady, N. P. (2017). Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 31(3), 551–559.

Cummings, G. G., Lee, S. D., & Tate, K. C. (2018). The evolution of oncology nursing: Leading the path to change. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal = Revue Canadienne de Nursing Oncologique, 28(4), 314–317.

Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, X., Wei, L., Chen, W., & Song, L. (2015). The incidence and risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter-related infection among cancer patients. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 11, 863–871.

Rupp, M. E., & Karnatak, R. (2018). Intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections. Infectious Disease Clinics, 32(4), 765-787.

See, I., Freifeld, A. G., & Magill, S. S. (2016). Causative organisms and associated antimicrobial resistance in healthcare-associated, central line–associated bloodstream infections from oncology settings, 2009–2012. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 62(10), 1203-1209.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Online Academic Experts
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Management
Love this writer!!! Great work
Customer 452597, April 5th, 2021
Literature
Thank you!
Customer 453145, April 19th, 2022
Social Sciences
Very fast report with excellent information on the topic. Thank you for your speedy service in such a short time.
Customer 453213, June 15th, 2022
Nursing
It was a very long paper, but she followed all the instructions, and she even finished the paper 5 days before the due date. Will write an essay with her again, thanks!
Customer 452967, November 27th, 2021
English 101
Thank you for this excellent analysis of the Alchemist.
Customer 453213, June 15th, 2022
Business and administrative studies
awesome job
Customer 453201, June 24th, 2022
Psychology
quick and before due date/time.
Customer 453027, January 29th, 2022
English 101
very good paper thank you.
Customer 453083, February 18th, 2022
Humanities
Thank youuuu
Customer 452729, May 30th, 2021
Education
Very fast response and did a excellent job.
Customer 453201, May 31st, 2022
English 101
great summery in terms of the time given. it lacks a bit of clarity but otherwise perfect.
Customer 452747, June 9th, 2021
Psychology
Came in as promissed. Good paper.
Customer 453027, January 6th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Live ChatWhatsApp