PICOT Statement for the Area of Interest

PICOT refers to the acronym for those elements that make up a clinical question. The elements are patient population (p), intervention (I), comparison intervention (c), outcome (O), and time (T) (Burns & Grove, 2011). The clinical issue under investigation in this case is whether or not using Influenza vaccine influences the risk of the contracting pneumonia during the flu season among persons who are aged 65 and above. There is a great interrelation between pneumonia and influenza. Research has shown that influenza is the major cause of pneumonia infections especially among the elderly persons aged 65 and above. To help reduce the incidence of the two infections, people are encouraged to receive influenza vaccines annually.

PICOT Statement for the area of Interest

The PICOT question being assessed by the nurse in this case is “In patients aged 65 and older, how does the use of an influenza vaccine, compared to not receiving the vaccine, influence their risk of developing pneumonia during the flu season?” It is clear that all the components of clinical questions are all present. The components are discussed below.

Patient Population

The population is patients aged 65 and above. The center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has established that persons who are 65 and older are more susceptible to influenza compared to the younger and more energetic population. The situation results from the fact that their immune system is weakened. According to the CDC, in the United States 90 percent of the mortality rates, that are seasonal flu related, occur among this group of individuals. Around 50- 60 percent of hospitalization cases that are seasonal flue related also occur among members of this population (Echevarria & Walker, 2014). Pneumonia is one of the flu related infections causing high morbidity and mortality rate in the population.

Intervention

Use of an influenza vaccine is the intervention (Melnyk & Overholt, 2011). The vaccine should be administered annually to the population. Use of the influenza vaccine protects the population against flu even during the flu season by boosting their immunity against the health condition. Such persons are, therefore, at a lower risk of contracting pneumonia. The vaccine should be administered again in the next one year.

Comparison Intervention

Not receiving the influenza vaccine is the comparison intervention (Melnyk & Overholt, 2011). It occurs in two forms. One can either fail to use the influenza vaccine throughout or delay the vaccination process beyond the one-year limit. Not receiving the influenza vaccination predisposes one to flu, especially during the flu season. Flu, on the other hand, predisposes one to pneumonia.

Outcome

Influence on the risk of developing pneumonia is the outcome (Melnyk & Overholt, 2011). Vaccinated 65 year olds have a lower likelihood of suffering from pneumonia compared to the unvaccinated.

Time

The flu season is the time taken to achieve the outcomes (Melnyk & Overholt, 2011). In this case, the outcomes of the intervention (I) and the comparison intervention (C) can only be well determined during the flu season. At the time, persons aged 65 and above have higher chances of contracting flu due to their weak immunity. Vaccinated individuals are less likely to contract pneumonia compared to those who are not vaccinated.

Conclusion

PICOT represents the elements that constitute a clinical question (Burns & Grove, 2011). It also provides a format to be used in the ordering of the elements in the clinical question. In this case, the PICOT question posed by the nurse is “In patients aged 65 and older, how does the use of an influenza vaccine compared to not receiving the vaccine influence their risk of developing pneumonia during the flu season?”

References

Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence based practice (5th ed.). Maryland Heights, MO: Elservier.

Echevarria, I. M., & Walker, S. (2014). To make your case, start with a PICOT question. Nursing, 44(2), 18-19.

Melnyk, B. M., & Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, CP: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Online Academic Experts
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Psychology
thank you!
Customer 452947, October 21st, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
I finished the first deliverable of a project presentation but had no time to finish my second deliverable. The writer revamped my first deliverable and made it much more appealing! Not only was I impressed with the content but I was so grateful for the time they took to redo the background. I have been under a lot of pressure at work and at home so this has been a great service when I have had little time! I appreciate the detail and help! Always on time and always exceeding expectations!
Customer 453077, April 5th, 2022
Business and administrative studies
awesome job
Customer 453201, June 24th, 2022
Nursing
The writer was timely and proficient. I had to ask for a revision, but I got it back quickly with no other issues. Would use this essay writing service again
Customer 452441, November 14th, 2021
Nursing
Paper much better compared to the one prior revision request. References need to be no more than the past 5 years.
Customer 452547, July 20th, 2021
Management
Thank you!!! I received my order in record timing.
Customer 452551, February 9th, 2021
Business Management
Awesome job, Thank you
Customer 453201, June 12th, 2022
Professions and Applied Sciences
Thanks. This helps a lot. Was a bit late but some cushion was given.
Customer 453015, February 10th, 2022
English 101
IThank you
Customer 452631, April 6th, 2021
Psychology
Thank you!
Customer 452545, February 6th, 2021
Social Work and Human Services
Great work I would love to continue working with this writer thought out the 11 week course.
Customer 452667, May 30th, 2021
History
Looks great and appreciate the help.
Customer 452675, April 26th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Live ChatWhatsApp